.Today I will meet Dr. Akihiro ,who works in Columbia University. I want to work in the U.S. for some reasons.So he is a model case for me. I'm not sure what he thinks , but he is also yui's friend. So he is so important for me.

Next week I will meet Dr.Lefor and after that I will go to the D-lab seminar.i am really interested in the D-lab because it is what i want to do.

I try my best to get into the D lab ....

I am wondering if I should go to the U.S. ASAP or not....

3/15

I went to Kaplan to make a debate. There, we were talking about the pension system. And I opposed to the current pension system. My proposition is to substitute the tax to the national pension. the reason why I chose national pension is National pension is not depend on the income.

So it'S so easy to application the advantage of this is " fair" and " easy".

First "simple". Current pension system is too complicated that those who had loss can't realize so. Indirectly they are deceived...If this happens the system gets easy to understand that they can criticize the pension system ,and it will get the motivation to take part in the election.

Second," fair" . Now the burden to sustain the elderly citizen is told like this ; 3people sustain an elderly. But ,because of low birth rate and aged society, it is increasing ; it is said to reach 1person to 1 person.,which is too heavy. But if the tax system is applied, it will reduce by //// . And also there are too many tax evaders in national pension. It is because of not good publcity, luck of PR. and there are also people who cannot afford for that.But in the future they can't get pension ,but there will be some support system for that ,which means they don't pay but they will get some profit. It's unfair.This system apply the consuming tax which means people who buy more pays more. There can't be no tax evader. And we can collect money from elderly citizens.

I think this system is so good that this should be applied neat in the future.

2/12@ ICS

I participated in the open forum of Aoyama Univ. Ishikura seminer. the discussion theme was Ho to make a global leader in 21st century?

I realized that I am so worried about my poorness of the way of construction of debate. I found difficulty in debate. So we couldn't reach the answer. Someone told me some question had no answer , but I believe we need the answer and we have to make our answer by ourselves.

The debate was not well-prepared actually. I think we should prepare for our own answers.

But still I realized my answer. Studying abroad and language and also enter the global pathway is the must.

Before next GAS I have to make a story of my theme. Anyway I try to keep myself enjoy in any ways.