3/15

I went to Kaplan to make a debate. There, we were talking about the pension system. And I opposed to the current pension system. My proposition is to substitute the tax to the national pension. the reason why I chose national pension is National pension is not depend on the income.

So it'S so easy to application the advantage of this is " fair" and " easy".

First "simple". Current pension system is too complicated that those who had loss can't realize so. Indirectly they are deceived...If this happens the system gets easy to understand that they can criticize the pension system ,and it will get the motivation to take part in the election.

Second," fair" . Now the burden to sustain the elderly citizen is told like this ; 3people sustain an elderly. But ,because of low birth rate and aged society, it is increasing ; it is said to reach 1person to 1 person.,which is too heavy. But if the tax system is applied, it will reduce by //// . And also there are too many tax evaders in national pension. It is because of not good publcity, luck of PR. and there are also people who cannot afford for that.But in the future they can't get pension ,but there will be some support system for that ,which means they don't pay but they will get some profit. It's unfair.This system apply the consuming tax which means people who buy more pays more. There can't be no tax evader. And we can collect money from elderly citizens.

I think this system is so good that this should be applied neat in the future.